Saturday, May 27, 2023

"I know a thing or two about performing, m'boy"

 fragment, from an essay about something else, on my favorite film 


“I am a bullet”—Chas Devlin

The essence of mod is the connection between Englishness, style, and violence. 

Rock ‘n’ roll had triggered violence before (with the cinema seat slashing done by Teddy Boys driven into a frenzy of excitement by the first rock’n’roll movies) but it had never represented it musically or enacted it onstage.   The mod sound was expressive not of sexual desire but of an unrest at once social and existential.  It's latent violence was dramatized by The Who in their climactic orgies of instrument-smashing: the orgasmic release that mod music and mod neurology required.

From violence aestheticized, to a kind of aesthete of violence:  Chas Devlin, the smooth criminal protagonist of Performance, a Donald Cammett and Nic Roeg directed film made in 1968 but released a couple of years later. Played by James Fox,  Chas  is an enforcer for a “firm” (criminal syndicate) in East London, a virtuoso “performer” who collects protection money and puts the squeeze on “flash little twerps”.  Chas is also a bit of a mod, what with his short hair, thin ties and sharp suits. He’s a narcissist who may have a homosexual past but currently goes in for S&M games with his girlfriend involving whips and mirrors. In one scene, we see Chas in his  bachelor pad in a posh apartment complex, dressing with great care. In a shot that seems to look ahead to Richard Gere in American Gigolo, Chas selects gold cuff links from a drawer that contains about a dozen sets, and then obsessively fussing over the placement of some magazines on his coffee table, making millimeter adjustments so that they are square with the edges of the table.  Then he’s off to threaten the owner of a betting shop who is being coerced into merging with the firm: the camera cuts from Devlin’s almost prissy sartorial rituals to a dustbin being hurled through the betting shop window by one of his thugs.  

Later, on the run after killing the betting shop owner, with whom he has some extremely personal history, Chas winds up hiding from the law in the Ladbroke Grove house of Turner, a burned-out and decadent rock star modeled on the Rolling Stones’s Brian Jones but actually played by Mick Jagger. Phoning an accomplice, Chas says he’s “on the left” (i.e. West London) and complains about the “long hair, beatniks, druggers, free love” atmosphere of his hideout. Chas is uptight and as Performance unfolds Turner and his lover Ferber (played by Brian Jones’s girlfriend Anita Pallenberg) loosen up their sociopath guest with hallucinogens, in order to break down his character armor and poke around inside his inner workings.

Whether deliberately intended as an in-joke or just an instinctive choice, the confrontation between the Rolling Stone and the mod-like Chas is inspired. Mods loathed the Stones, regarding them as scruffy art-school bohemians with dirty long hair. The very things that made Jagger, Jones and Richards anti-heroic role models for bourgeois students the world over was what convinced the mods they were posh middle class kids slumming it.  The antipathy endured:  echoing Pete Meaden’s definition of mod as “clean living under difficult circumstances”, Paul Weller once declared his belief in “clean culture, real culture. Not all this bullshit… rock fuckin’ image and…. elegantly wasted wankers, like Keith Richards.”   

One of the key figures behind Performance was David Litvinoff. He’s credited as Dialogue Consultant and Technical Advisor, but his most important role was serving as the conduit between the demimonde of upper class Chelsea and the East London underworld inhabited by the Kray Twins (the sharp dressed mobsters who provided the model for Chas’s firm).  

In his BFI  Film Classics monograph on Performance,  Colin McCabe describes Litvinoff as “ suppressed, violent, buttoned up...”  But then again “buttoned up”, or it’s more common equivalent “bottled up”, could almost be the definition of  Englishness....







































director's cut bit on Performance from S+A

The Man Who Fell to Earth  deserves its reputation as one of the most successful – artistically, not so much commercially – rock star as movie actor turns to date. Probably it’s only real rival is the earlier Roeg movie Performance, which he co-directed with writer Donald Cammell.  Performance and The Man Who Fell To Earth go together, and not just because Bowie’s frenemy Mick Jagger starred in the former . The two movies form a conceptual pair, bookending the glam era. 

Filmed in 1968, Performance is absolutely Sixties, but it rehearses the themes of the pop era that followed swiftly upon the film’s delayed release in 1970. Decadence, sexual indeterminacy, the theatricality of performance are all in there, along with a persistent motif to do with mirrors (used to causing doubling and gender-blurring effects). There’s magic too: upper class bohemian Cammell was fascinated by Crowley and friends with Kenneth Anger, whose movies are clear influence on Performance. Cammell had a role in Lucifer Rising, playing Osiris the God of Death.

Just like The Man Who Fell To Earth, the plotline of Performance is really a frame for the draping of  highly-charged tableaux  and the elaboration of Roeg’s hallucinatory camerawork, with its disorientating edits and slippages of time and perspective.  The basic story involves the flight of an East End enforcer, Chas Devlin, who has incurred the wrath of his Kray Twins-like gang boss.  Posing as a juggler, Devlin takes refuge in the Ladbroke Grove house of Turner, a burned-out, reclusive rock star (modeled largely on Brian Jones, but  played by Jagger). Druggy, polysexual cavortings ensue, as Turner and his lover Pherber  Anita Pallenberg - once Brian Jones’s partner, by that point Keith Richards’s girlfriend) try to dismantle their sociopathic guest’s character armor and poke around inside his psyche.  

Long haired and made-up, the feminized Turner is the opposite of the proudly “all man” Devlin. Except that the East End gangland culture he comes from has a homo-erotic undercurrent: boss of the firm Harry Flowers dallies with toy boys, and it’s implied that Chas also has a homosexual past about which he’s in literally violent denial.  

Another glammy thread in the film relates to ideas of performance and identity.  The script was originally titled The Liars. Both rock star and gangster project a front as part of their trade. Devlin uses intimidation, a psychopathic aura, far more than actual violence.  In the movie’s critical exchange, Turner lectures the “juggler” Devlin (who he earlier described as “a performer of natural magic”) about theatre.  "I know a thing or two about performing, my boy!.... The only performance that makes it, that really makes it,  that makes it all the way, is the one that achieves madness. Am I right?”.

But Turner also knows that he’s lost his mojo: precisely the ability to believe the illusion he’s projecting. Devlin, whose name is close to devil, still has his “daemon,” as Pherber calls it. “He wants to know why your show is a bigger turn-on than his ever was,” she tells Devlin. She says that the criminal provides a “dark little mirror” that will perhaps help the fading rock star escape the hole in which “he’s stuck. Stuck!”

The second half of Man Who Fell To Earth - Newton under house arrest, passing time in kinky but listless sex, drinking gin by the gallon -  virtually repeats the  atmosphere of aimless decadence and psychic seclusion that pervades Turner’s West London townhouse. Roeg spoke of how Jagger and Bowie both possessed a charisma and physical presence that couldn’t be learned at acting school. “They’re not just a singer with a band. Their whole magnetism comes out in acting.” 

Neither film is strictly speaking about rock – Man Who Fell  To Earth isn’t at all, while Performance barely touches on music-making or the rock biz. But they jostle for first place as rock movies, capturing more of the spirit of their rock era – and more of their respective rock star in a starring role – than any of the films that more obviously deal with rock. 















 "and the only promotional poster that makes it, that truly makes it, that makes it all the way, is the one that achieves MADNESS!"




thankfully withdrawn poster for the movie!

10 comments:

  1. Wasn't Pallenberg Keef's girlfriend at the time of Performance? I vaguely remember that Richards was not happy about her appearing as Jagger's girlfriend.

    There are two odd things about Performance that tend to get overlooked. The first is the extremely strong racism of the gangsters as they view the changing London. A kind of furious territorialism that I guess was more openly expressible at the time.

    The second is the repeated appearance of the SR-71 Blackbird spy plane, which does actually anticipate The Man Who Fell To Earth. I vaguely sense that it is supposed to represent the American superpower objectively watching over England, gathering data. That the drama Devlin/Turner is small beer compared to the all-seeing-eye that passes above them, out of sight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't picked up on either of those things - and this is a film I have watched at least a dozen times I should think. I can recite the dialogue of whole stretches - it drives the wife barmy!

      I can remember there's a scene where Chas is threatening the Asian owner of a Soho blue movie dive - and the extortee does whimper bitterly, in an aside to the camera, "British justice!". But I don't remember actual racism uttered by the minions of the Firm, although it would be, unfortunately, a completely authentic period touch.

      There is that hilarious scene where the thugs are off on their morning drive and one of them is complaining about violence on the telly at a time when children are watching - "ketchup all over the screen" or words to that effect.

      A different view of the East End as a mixing pot comes from this interesting little film made by entertainer Georgia Brown from about 1974 - I've been meaning to post it. It's actually really about the Jewish East End - Lionel Bart makes an appearance, someone she knew from the school yard.

      The spy plane thing is interesting. There's that whole thing about "America's a blinding place" - land of opportunity for those who operate outside the law. C.f. the linkup with the Yanks in The Long Good Friday - and the American mob's disdain for UK as small potatoes.

      Delete
    2. this is the Georgia Brown film Who Are The Cockneys Now - and it's actually from 1968, so EXACTLY when Performance is being made. https://youtu.be/-7uW7koB7pw

      Delete
    3. The spy plane is a motif throughout the film, but it's easy to miss because it's just a brief clip of it roaring past, and it isn't directly tied in with the narrative. I think it's the key to the film though, because of course it also brings in the notion of voyeurism, like Devlin watching Turner in bed with the two girls - The Spy in the House of Love - and Turner filming himself with them. And then there's this sinister, phallic aircraft that keeps roaring overhead, photographing everything.

      Delete
    4. The psychology of racism, and the way it is connected to other pathologies, is definitely part of the subtext to Performance. As well as the points you mentioned, it's also there in the Notting Hill setting, and the use of The Last Poets' searing Wake Up N****** on the soundtrack.

      Delete
  2. There's one significant offshoot of Performance I think is worth a mention.
    Yes, I'm talking about the Mondays again, and this time it's their first masterpiece Bummed. Bummed samples Performance repeatedly, and wallows exuberantly in the same mud of criminality and sleaze. But curiously, one could not call the Mondays glam at all, or at most very tangentially. This is despite them having the most feted dancer in popular music. You can find fair comparisons with Slade (working class gang taking on the world) and Roxy Music (not least, the underdressed lovelies bedecking the album sleeves), but to employ the word "glam" with regard to the Mondays feels deeply wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yeah, 'glam' would never be a word you'd think of in relation to Happy Mondays!

      Re Performance, it figures it would appeal to them as the cinematography and editing are trippy, good for watching under the influence. And overtly it's about drugs some of the time. But equally it's all about hard men, gangs, etc so that's there an element too. Not that they were that, exactly - but it's a world they'd have brushed against and seen around them.

      Trying to think of the specific references in Bummed - there's a song called "Mad Cyril", right? Is that the one with the dialogue sample, James Fox as Chas saying "I like a bit of a cavort"? What are the other nods and interpolations?.

      Delete
    2. I think the Mad Cyril samples are different. "I like a bit of a cavort" is used in E=MC2, Mick Jones' touchingly earnest tribute to Roeg with Big Audio Dynamite.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, Mad Cyril has several samples from Performance, but not that ("I like that, turn it up!" and "Putting the frighteners on flash little twerps", stuff like that). The other big reference to Performance is the song Performance (I know, subtle). Brain Dead begins with Our Shaun declaring "You're rendering that scaffolding dangerous!", which comes from Gimme Shelter, another Mick Jagger film from 1970 (one that's genuinely nasty and sordid). I've not seen Performance for years, so I'd have to revisit and devote some time to compile a comprehensive list of Bummed's allusions to it.

      Re. the Mondays and gangs: Paul Ryder gave an effective cameo in 24 Hour Party People as the tooled-up gang leader who Tony Wilson ends up hiring to man the Haçienda's door. Paul Ryder always looked like it was unwise to catch his eye. I've never seen a picture of him smiling, as a google image search will testify towards. Thinking of that, and of Bowie as an alien in The Man who Fell to Earth, it makes me wonder why Mick Jagger hasn't sought a film role as a businessman. That must be the part he's built for, right?

      Delete
  3. Jagger as businessman - well for the duration of this Performance interlude, he does a good job as boss of the firm https://youtu.be/T3qgmVb4-kU

    ReplyDelete

Oh, Geneva

  Huysmans and Her Liquid Skyjuice Vince Noir's twisted sister Romo's Romo Tuxedomoonstruck Drunk on Duchampagne Nina Hagendaaz Mald...