Monday, July 31, 2023

Street Incredibility

These photos of wrestling legend Adrian Street (RIP) with his coal miner dad and workmates perfectly capture the dialectical relationship between glam and grime.






Jeremy Deller wrote an essay about these "revenge photographs", the top one in the batch above he's described as "the most important photograph taken in Britain after the war"

"In 1973, photographer Dennis Hutchinson was tasked with taking portraits of Adrian Street for a lengthy piece of editorial in the Sunday People newspaper. He had asked Street to suggest a location, and he said he wanted to be photographed in Wales, at the coal miner’s pit where he used to work as a teenager. He wanted to be shot with his father, who still worked there, and whom he hated.

"In fact, he hated all the people in the picture, hated the pit, hated the village. He told Hutchinson, “I want to show them what I’ve made of my life, what I’ve become since leaving Wales.” He’s wearing his European Champion middleweight belt, as though to say, “Look, you peasants, this is what I’ve made of myself. I don’t have to go down a mine every day.” He’s returned as a success; a sort of prodigal son in reverse. This was his calculated expression of his showbiz, glamorous life. He’d clearly thought about this photo for a long time, planned it for years. He’d been biding his time.

"The rather classical composition makes this photo resemble a Renaissance painting. When I first encountered it, on the cover of an album by the band Black Box Recorder (an album called England Made Me, which is ironic because the picture was taken in Wales) I found it shocking, but knew nothing about it. At a guess, I assumed it was a publicity image of a glam rock musician, taken at a coal mine. It took me back to my childhood, when the biggest things going on in the country seemed to be industrial strife and glam rock; and here, in the photo, were both. 


It was only when I saw it again, reproduced at a smaller size in grainy black and white in a book about wrestling, that I began to get a sense of what was really going on here. It had much less visual impact, but I now knew that it was not a photo of a musician, but of a wrestler, Adrian Street.

Street was always keenly interested in marketing himself, in him ‘as a brand’, as we’d put it now. He claims to have been one of the inspirations for the glam rock movement, and apparently he was acknowledged as such by Marc Bolan. Street saw a wrestling match as a kid and thought it was the thing for him; he liked the theatricality. Boxing also has an element of that, but wrestling is neigh on pure theatre. Street was a strong-willed child and he remained strong-willed: driven, egotistical, self-centred and self-aware. He would admit these things, these aren’t criticisms. His first professional wrestling match was in 1957 and from the early 1960s, he started bleaching his hair platinum blond, and wore increasingly outrageous clothes. Even though he was absolutely straight, he realised that his camp yet tough look would be more lucrative, because people would be more interested to see him wrestle. The more outrageous a character you were in the ring, the more successful you’d be. Even if you were a baddie – in wrestling these characters are called ‘heels’, who are ‘scripted’ by the promotors – people wanted to see you lose because they hated you. You got a reaction.

"I’ve gone through Adrian’s albums; he’s got a big archive and a lot of photographs are of him looking very dressed up in public places. He’s always ‘on’, always the wrestler, walking around and posing. This photograph is a way of asserting that persona. It’s Adrian showing the men back home what he’s made of his life after he left them. They had all said, “You’ll be back, because you won’t make it as a wrestler or as a bodybuilder. We’ll see you in a few months.” That was in the 1950s, and this photo is of his return, in the wary 1970s, having transformed into this exotic creature. The Sunday People would undoubtedly have had a circulation of millions, and this photo is how he wanted to be seen by the rest of the world.

"Street’s father looks quizzical here, and rather concerned. According to Adrian, there was no acceptance whatsoever. His dad made a point of pretending not to be impressed by anything. Adrian would take his parents on what were, in the 1970s, really fancy holidays, to places like Thailand, but his dad would feign indifference. They genuinely didn’t get on. To be as unusual looking as Adrian was, was not to be encouraged. Pit villages were very conservative environments. People with massive amounts of self belief, like Adrian Street, have always had to transform themselves and their lives. In that sense, his is a mythic story."

Deller also made a doc about Street called So Many Ways to Hurt You: The Life and Times of Adrian Street

 
The dialectical relationship between glam and grime - that reminded me of these bits from Billy Liar  I borrowed for the Roxy Music chapter 

The Roxy was the last splash of light before Stradhoughton petered out and the moors took over"

 “Lying in bed, I abandoned the facts again and was back in Ambrosia.” 
(the opening line - Billy Fisher putting off getting up and going to work at the undertakers;  Ambrosia the fantasy land in which he's a benign dictator)

I also have a quote from another BF - Bryan Ferry - whose dad actually worked in a colliery, looking after the pit ponies.

 “I rejected my parents in my mind...  I went through a period of resenting my parents because I wasn't born rich and I felt.... that my lot wasn't all that it should be. My parents are the nicest people you could possibly meet, but they're not the least bit intellectual. And I really resented that, too, at one time.”  

In the movie version, Billy Fisher reimagines his mam and dad as "mater and pater" - toffs from some Noel Coward drawing-room play. 

versus the frumpy facts of life 




BF on the popularity of Roxy in Cleveland and Detroit - "places like where I come from, a very hard area... They see [Roxy] as a means of escaping all that.

Adrian Street sometimes went by the name "Exotic" Adrian Street - exotic meaning literally "from outside", "not from these parts", "doesn't belong here"

Street, looking a bit Eno-in-Roxy






















Looks like he actually had a go at being a pop star


And had at least one tribute song written about him, this glammish-sounding droll memory of Street as seen "on the first colour telly / in our valley"










17 comments:

  1. Another young man with a colliery background who became a wrestler in the Fifties, and distinguished himself in the ring by dyeing his hair platinum blond was.......Jimmy Savile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yikes!

      Didn't know JS had been a wrestler. I knew he had been a manager of dance halls but also bit of a hoodlum / hardman, or at least with connections to gangs. Looking him up I see the word "Bevin Boy" which is a term new to me - young men conscripted to work in mines during the war.

      Delete
  2. I've never seen those Ferry quotes, but they're something I had guessed anyway - his idea of glamor and sophistication is a poor boy's conception of it, which is a prominent wrinkle in the stereotypical image of him (there's a late-00s interview where the journalist bemused to find that Ferry's own self-described primal scenes are his childhood trips to Blackpool)

    Glam/grime is a huge dialectic in pop music, because it's largely based on the wish fulfillment of poor kids launching themselves out of poverty and gorging on their dreams - you could use that to explain Elvis and Graceland, rhinestone cowboys/Nudie-suit country performers, R&B and blues performers with a dozen rings on each hand, rappers with diamond grills - none of which is treated by their fans as betraying their roots, but as extending them to 'the top'.

    Less fantastically, you could also see that as a key element in how the actual 'people at the top' manipulate those performers - giving them plenty of what in my childhood in the South was either called 'redneck money' or (if you were black, or a racist white) 'N-word money' - money blown on and tied to lavish acquisitions that could be easily repossessed if/when need be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Freddie Mercury to his biographer Lesley Ann Jones in the mid-80s; as quoted here https://64quartets.wordpress.com/2020/03/17/4-queen/
      "I’ve created a monster. The monster is me. I can’t blame anyone for this. It’s what I’ve worked for since I was a child. I would have killed for this. Whatever happens to me is all my fault. It’s what I wanted."

      Delete
    2. Yes glam is really nouveau riche aesthetic in lots of ways.

      I watched a whole, quite-good drama series about Tammy Wynette and George Jones and I was really struck by how glitzy Tammy's stage costumes were. Somehow I'd thought she have a more down-home look. Actually I think she did early on, in the main clip I've seen, for "Stand By Your Man". But later on the look gets very Las Vegas.

      Delete
    3. That's a fabulous quote from Freddie. I wonder if Gaga read it and that's where the whole Fame Monster came from. She's audibly a Queen fan, in her some of her music.

      One thing I've noticed (as a teacher, confronted by the tastes of students) is that Queen have become absolutely canonic and central as a group. Like almost in the vicinity of the Beatles etc. Whereas when I grew up, Queen seemed like the height of uncool and bad taste. Like I wouldn't have known anyone hip who took them seriously.

      Am I imagining this or did "monstrosity" become a bit of an academic buzz concept in the last decade or so? Possibly influenced by the term's currency in pop music (Kanye etc)

      Delete
    4. If you're interested in the history of 'cowboy glam', I would start with the actual man behind the Nudie suit, Nudie Cohn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudie_Cohn

      Queen have become canonical for a lot of reasons, but I think one is that, like the Beatles and 70s Pink Floyd, they ride the line between accessible and semi-esoteric - you can know the hits and be fine, but there's plenty to dig into if you go beyond them, and they form a lot of kids' first art-rock/pop starter kits.

      Delete
    5. Yes, Queen are absolutely canonical now, and as Simon has said, I also remember when they were the epitome of "naff", which is a word that has gone into disuse unfortunately, despite being an excellent descriptive term.

      The "big four" canonical groups seem to be The Beatles, Pink Floyd, Queen and Led Zeppelin, and they all seem to have key things in common, including a long run of successful albums, eccentricity, variety and musical strength in depth, innovation, an internal mythology and external "story" etc. All those groups basically created their own worlds which you can hang around in as long as you like. They're a bit Tolkienesque, in that kind of way.

      Delete
    6. To be fair, Floyd and Zeppelin were also colossally naff in the late 70s and early to mid 80s, at least in the UK. My teenage set of what I guess you would now call "Classic Rock" fans was absolutely ostracised by all the cool kids.

      Delete
    7. On Ferry: the irony of his life is that, thanks to his success, he has become in reality the decadent aristocrat he aspired to be semi-ironically when he was young. Even down to the gormless hunting-obsessed failson.

      Delete
  3. So what act is the poshest? Genesis?

    The big four don't include the Rolling Stones? Surely it should therefore be a big five? But I wonder if this indicates a particularly American consideration of British rock? And the Americans have quite the history of missing the point of British acts (the Clash are probably the most traduced by the American perspective, shaving off the punk elements and reducing them to a superior rock act).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should probably be a big eight with the 'Oo, the Stownes, AC/DC and the Sabs. But I don't make the rules.

      There's a definite effect going on where bands that didn't make it in the US become the victims of the algorithms on Youtube and the like. The Jam are an obvious example of a "big" band in the UK becoming diminished over time, as though they were just some kind of local cult band, which obviously wasn't the case. It could have been the case that something like Youtube should give the Americans a chance to see what they missed, but they just ain't interested in the unfamiliar.

      I can't really criticize them for this though, because there's no fckn way I'm going to start checking out the likes of Johnny Winter or Bonnie Raitt or Tom Petty or whatever.

      Delete
  4. But back to Adrian Street, you know his dad is really striking some pretty chad poses there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chad - I've been out of the country too long, I don't know what this means!

      Delete
    2. It's American, not British. If you are lucky enough to have never come across it, that is a sign you are not spending enough time online!

      Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_(slang)#:~:text=The%20slang%20term%20Chad%20was,very%2Dgood%2Dlooking%20male.

      Delete
    3. Dad's refusing to follow the script though. He's refusing to look meek in front of his exotic/degenerate progeny. He's speaking for the South Wales colliery massive by futuristically adopting that unimpressed folded-arm pose that rappers employ to show that they're ignoring being dissed.

      In fact, it's Mr. Street senior who is being the visionary here.

      Delete

tres debonAyers

Some people have compared Kevin Ayers's debonair image to Bryan Ferry - the genuine genteel article as opposed to the faux. Some even se...