Monday, December 18, 2023

bow down

On the occasion of her documentary film about her tour about her album Renaissance Beyoncé has gotten some flak for not taking a stand on Gaza and for allowing the film to be screened in Israel

In an acerbic Vulture piece, Angelica Jade Bastién  says "there is no star of such magnitude who more cunningly positions themselves as apolitical than Beyoncé. Her performance as an icon is meant to connect with the broadest number of people possible. To do that, her refusal to stand for anything specific beyond the watered-down treatises on Black excellence must be maintained."

She examine how Beyoncé traffics, in this film and earlier ones, in "fake intimacy":  

"Every time you think you’ve seen behind the curtain, you realize there’s another curtain upon another stage. This isn’t new for her. Consider previous projects like the labored 2013 film Life Is But a Dream and the more successfully realized Homecoming in 2019. From this vantage point, fake intimacy is a currency she utilizes to give the appearance of revelation even if she actually remains as closed as a fist. Beyoncé positions herself not as a goddess bestowing a peek of humanity to her loyal subjects but as a relatable figure we can and should connect with. But if you have cameras on you all the time, even when you’re supposed to be “off,” when do you take down the performative mask? It isn’t even when she has knee surgery, a moment carefully documented on camera. For Beyoncé, a woman known to film her every move and house it in a temperature-controlled archive, everything is performance and each performance is merely a means of brand extension."

There are some jaw-dropping facts about the expense and labour (and carbon footprint) of the tour: 

"There were around 160 trucks used merely to transfer the stage from stadium to stadium, and the crowd sometimes numbered up to 70,000. These are not intimate shows but a demonstration of excessive spectacle"

Despite a dedicated moment of spotlighting of all the drones involved in making it happen - "stage hands and builders decked in shining chrome, backup singers and crucial musicians that share the live stage, seamstresses and designers, makeup artists and hair stylists, and dance captains like Amari Marshall" - Bastién says the doc is "still closer to an archival monument for the greatness of its performer, writer, and director.....   More than anything, Renaissance is a testament that Beyoncé is a brand that stands for absolutely nothing beyond its own greatness."

Bastién's casual use of phrases like "loyal subjects" and "aesthetic might" in her otherwise caustic piece reminded me of how baked into Beyoncé discourse are ideas of a/ regality and b/ entertainment as subjugation.  

The regality might partially explain the apolitics - if she's anything like the British monarchy, her reign would be dependent on not taking a stand or speaking out, but being a queen for everybody - a figurehead transcending ideology.

Another recent piece about the Renaissance concert movie is also limned with tropes to do with regality and masochistic evocations of overwhelming entertainment. 

Spencer Kornhaber recalls watching her 2016 tour:  "Even from the nosebleeds, she seemed huge, and impossibly important. I felt like I was watching the Statue of Liberty come alive, declare herself empress of Earth, and twerk." 

By comparison the Renaissance tour felt more collective - about the audience as much as the performer -  and Kornhaber did not "leave the show with the classic Beyoncé feeling of having one’s skull crushed by a higher power."

The film has "plenty of moments" that" will make the viewer feel, to use the lingo of the ballroom subculture that inspired Renaissance, her latest album, gagged by opulence" but he argues that at this point  "Beyoncé... wants her brand to be less about … herself."

Yet, the text still feels the pull of hierarchic imagery: there's a description of her Coachella performance doc Homecoming, which "essentially created a human pyramid with one woman at the apex."

The final paragraphs note sagely that while "great pop stars always gesture to a communal ideal—fans as family, dancing as democracy.. At base, though, they sell dominance and submission: a fantasy of the world’s problems pacified by a noble tyrant." 

While Beyoncé makes these gestures towards sharing the limelight, ultimately the Queen is "hardly surrendering her claim to power and control. As the movie’s credits play, so does a tremendous new song in which she raps, with boxerly aggressiveness, about house—the musical style, the material achievement, the place to host guests and raise families. Implicitly, she’s inviting us all inside her walls. And yet, she very amusingly keeps shouting, “Get the fuck up out my house!” She knows we still want to be commanded—and that not everything she’s got can be shared."

House becomes a palace. 


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Here's my own Beyoncé take from S+ A

2013 February 

Beyoncé’s half-time performance at the Superbowl is the victory lap capping off her global superstardom. Planned for months, costing millions, involving 500 local volunteers to erect the stage in addition to Beyoncé’s own crew, the fifteen-minute mini-concert is a celebration of Queen Bey’s remorseless flawlessness. 

It starts with a taped speech of football manager Vince Lombardi gravely exhorting the pursuit of excellence “with all of one’s might”.  The glamour and clamour, Lombard intones, are just the exterior testament to what really matters: an implacable inner drive to dominate, “the spirit, the will to excel, the will to win.”  Beyoncé literally erupts onto the stage, to the sound of her hit “Run the World.”   For the next fourteen minutes she flexes her vocal training and rehearsed flair amid what seems like hundreds of lights blaring thousands of watts.  It’s a fiesta of feminine incandescence - jets of fire, guitars with roman candles ejaculating sparks from either end of the instrument - with special FX mirroring that “clones” a mini-army of Beyoncés.

Beyoncé at the Superbowl is like the Panopticon in reverse: surveillance turned inside out, “all eyes on me.”  110 million watch it in real-time; many more world-wide catch it later on the Internet.  “All minds on me” too: the performance generates 300 thousand tweets per minute. Critics prostrate themselves like obsequious courtiers. Rolling Stone’s reviewer gushes that the set’s supposed absence of crowd-pleasing favorites indicates that “she’s Beyoncé and Beyoncé can get away with doing whatever Beyoncé feels like doing”  -  less a critical assessment than a curtsey.

The Beyoncé spectacular is nominated in multiple technical categories at the Emmys. But it wins for just one:  “Outstanding Lighting Design/Lighting Direction.”   Deservedly: it’s the overkill climax of an illumination-escalation that has seen awards ceremonies and arena shows get more audience-stunning and retina-bruising with each year.  Light and power have always been linked historically, from the candle power that only lords and kings could afford, to the splendor of bright dyes and glittering gems that shone out in a world of murk and squalor.  Beyoncé at the ‘Bowl is where bling and blitz converge: a tour de force of shock and awe.  



4 comments:

  1. Bastién is a fucking killer critic, so I'm glad you took notice on one of her rare music-related pieces (she usually writes pretty exclusively about film)

    Matthew Perpetua recently put together one of his excellent Fluxblog playlists around the origins as pop-as-genre - meaning as a category unto itself, rather than as a catchall term for popular music in general - and it made me realize that that construct is arguably past its prime.

    Today's notable mainstream musicians (whatever that term means these days) tend to fit into older established formats like rock, hiphop, country, electronic, etc. rather than the crossover four quadrant blockbuster model, with Lorde and the solo Harry Styles probably being the last big breakouts who aspired to that. (Even seeming exceptions to that like Del Rey or Ellish have MOs closer to quirky, quasi-art-rock eclecticism, instead of Max Martin-style mega-hooks you can't argue with)

    In that light, the recent globe conquering, film commemorated tours by Beyonce and Taylor Swift (the two remaining idols from the 00s/10s working at full market power) feel more like both benedictions for their previous careers on top and a smart way to start working towards dominating the heritage circuit

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rather than the British monarchy, the figure that Beyonce reminds of most is Louis XIV. He lived his entire life in public. Versailles was as much a theatre of royalty as a palace or a place of government. He would wake up and get out of bed in front of an open window with his subjects below. He would dine in front of his subjects. It's not clear to me that he had any notion of an interior life. His life was all on the surface. Beyonce strikes me as being a similar kind of person. There is no "real" Beyonce - or rather the real Beyonce is the performance. I'm flashing on Erving Goffman here.

    I'm not especially interested in royalty, Beyonce included. However my Australian wife can't get enough of this stuff. Perhaps Peter Morgan's next series will be about Beyonce and Jay-Z now that he's milked the royal family dry.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Louis Quatorze, absolutely. I didn't know that about his staging of his everyday life in front of the subjects, though. But the connection between royalty and the theatre in the 17th and 18th Century seems striking to me - Charles II and Nell Gwynne, the Restoration also being the reopening of the theatres that had been banned during the Interregnum.

    I don't know if it all comes from Beyonce but I've been struck by the regal staging in certain R&B videos - FKA Twigs seems to go in for this kind of thing, a ceremonial feeling and a certain static, non-kinetic aura around the focal figure, the star. SOPHIE"s Faceshopping, although that's probably directly from ballroom's queenly aesthetics.

    It's a sort of monumentalism - I daresay there's twerktastic kineticism in other parts of the Show, but the clip I've seen from Renaissance tour, she descends from the sky on a large horse, like a monarch in a parade, completely upright and statuesque.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So there is one sense in which Beyonce is not classically regal. She is obsessed with having her hard work acknowledge by the audience. The constant sense I have of her is someone desperate for my approval, for recognition of all the effort she has put in. There is something "uneffortless" about Beyonce.

    She was a child star with a hard-driving father as her manager. All her shows reek of "Is this good enough, daddy?"

    Like many royals, her life was warped from an early age.

    Whereas I don't think Rihanna gives a f*** about my approval.

    ReplyDelete

anti-theatricality + politics (the finale?)

A wise person once said: “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king. The palace becomes a circus.” Donald Trump is a clown....